
Assessment of quality of life in chronic illnesses has become a vital tool not only in the monitoring of treatment outcomes but also because it has been established to significantly influence morbidity and mortality. HRQOL assessment can be carried out using general or disease-specific instruments, which could be objective or subjective, or satisfaction- or function-based. It could be subdivided into measures of functional status, health status, and well-being and patient satisfaction. Each has its recognized merits and demerits, which include ease of interpretation, applicability and validation for different communities and comparability of results. A number of researchers utilize multiple instruments to be able to assess different subscales of HRQOL, as suggested by Gill and Feinstein.

































