<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Canadian Medicine &#187; health communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/tag/health-communication/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:54:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Development and Validation of Tools to Assess Genetic Discrimination: DISCUSSION</title>
		<link>http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/discussion.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/discussion.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instrument development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism and genetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/?p=790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the technological spin-offs from the HGP become more prevalent, there are a variety of concerns about the way in which this technology will be incorporated into social life, particularly concerns about genetic discrimination. While the work associated with the HGP affirms that social rather than genetic explanations account for disparities in disease linked to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/discussion.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Development and Validation of Tools to Assess Genetic Discrimination: Results</title>
		<link>http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/development-and-validation-of-tools-to-assess-genetic-discrimination-results.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/development-and-validation-of-tools-to-assess-genetic-discrimination-results.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instrument development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism and genetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/?p=784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to the first research question, a five-factor solution for the genetic discrimination instrument (GDI) emerged as the most parsimonious structure, including 20 items that accounted for 50.11% of the variance (Table 2). The five dimensions of genetic discrimination included: 1) a seven-item individual reproductive rights factor (M=2.21, SD=1.14; S2=26.47%, a=0.91); 2) three-item social [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/development-and-validation-of-tools-to-assess-genetic-discrimination-results.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Development and Validation of Tools to Assess Genetic Discrimination: METHOD</title>
		<link>http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/development-and-validation-of-tools-to-assess-genetic-discrimination-method.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/development-and-validation-of-tools-to-assess-genetic-discrimination-method.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instrument development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism and genetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/?p=781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This research was conducted in three phases: 1) formative research, 2) pilot study and 3) instrument development. Formative Research Phase This phase of the study involved 15 focus groups conducted with 120 participants who had not previously undergone genetic testing and had little knowledge of human genetics as assessed by screening questions during recruitment. Focus [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/development-and-validation-of-tools-to-assess-genetic-discrimination-method.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Development and Validation of Tools to Assess Genetic Discrimination: PSYCHOLOGICAL DIMENSION</title>
		<link>http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/psychological-dimension.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/psychological-dimension.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instrument development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism and genetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/?p=777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A long history of noncompliance in medicine supports the vital role played by health beliefs on health behavior. Current levels of adherence to drug regimens, for example, are low. An analysis of compliance rates reported in studies of heart disease as one illustration showed that only 31-66% of patients stayed in care, between 31-58% took [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canadianmedicine4all.com/psychological-dimension.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

