SECTION THREE: MODES OF IMPLEMENTATION This essay has examined diversity rights claims within the medical profession systemically—especially in its manner of training and admitting new practitioners to orthopedic surgery. If the above argument is correct, increasing diversity among African Americans, Latinos, Native Americans, and women in orthopedic surgery is necessary for moral and prudential reasons. [...]
Continue reading " Diversity and Professional Excellence: SECTION THREE "
SECTION TWO: THE PRUDENTIAL ARGUMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL DIVERSITY At this point, our argument takes a rather different direction. We contend that (ethics aside) a profession that is more diverse in its membership will be more excellent in the execution of its functional tasks than one that is not diverse. For purposes of clarification, we will [...]
Continue reading " Diversity and Professional Excellence: SECTION TWO "
So far this essay has contended that morality demands proportional diversity in the professions (based upon the puzzle-maker model of merit). This section will also argue for the ethical foundations of proportional diversity within the professions via an argument that goes to the nature of professional ethics itself: the contract with the host society. On [...]
SECTION ONE: THE MORAL ARGUMENT FOR PROPORTIONAL DIVERSITY In this section of the paper, two aspects of the moral argument will be explored. First, a general moral argument will be presented on the basis of merit considerations. Second, an argument based upon professional ethics will be put forth.
Continue reading " Diversity and Professional Excellence: SECTION ONE "
INTRODUCTION To begin, it is important to introduce the two authors of this paper. Richard Grant is an orthopedic surgeon with national credentials serving on numerous governing boards. Michael Boylan is a philosopher who has written on medical ethics. The two of us began this paper over a year ago in various discussions we had [...]
